
Reasons to like... NASCAR
- Published on Apr 6th, 2011 by Craig NormansellThe National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing has been active since 1948 yet bar from the occasional burst on some tucked away sports channel, British racing enthusiats may or may not know exactly what they are missing out on. Hopefully, a few of these reasons will bring everyone up to speed - pun fully intended - on Kimi Raikkonen's new career venture.
It's cheap to run a team, and cheap to sit and watch. There are over 40 participants in most NASCAR races, which shows how easy it is to buy the kit and run it - sponsorship permitting. The fanbase isn't just the stereotypical Southern American clientel either, with crowds coming from all over the country to watch races. With three series held most weekends (Camping Truck, Nationwide and Sprint), there's plenty to see for half the cost of an F1 ticket. Pay that little extra to take your campervan into the infield though, and you get a special view of the whole circuit. How can F1 compete with that?
Most drivers have some kind of cool nickname. "The Rainbow Warrior" Jeff Gordan. "Million Dollar" Bill Elliot. "The Ironman" Terry Labonte. Sounds like a night of boxing in the East End, but trust me, they are all legit. Darlington Speedway is even nicknamed "The Lady in Black". Yes, it's a bit melodramatic, but it's a great way for the fans to root for their favourites. Don't for get the merchandising either.

Photo: www.jpmontoya.com
There's a great spirit of family tradition. Many of NASCAR's greatest moments are when a son emulates the father in competing, and winning. There has been examples of a retired driver even commentating on his son's Daytona 500 victory, and a father beating his son to the win at the same track. "The King" Richard Petty was himself a second generation driver, his son Kyle then went on to race (and win), with then his son Adam competing. Just to keep track, that's four generations of one family racing in NASCAR. That's pretty much unprecedented.
F1 has Monaco, NASCAR has Daytona. It's billed as the one everyone wants to win, and holds a certain allure over drivers that the principality has over Grand Prix racers. Until 1959, it was held actually on Daytona Beach in Florida, before moving to it's home of the Speedway oval.
No electronics, no traction control. No grey areas. There are no CPU units attached to the engines on any car on the grid. That means there is no way a team can add any kind of software to help with traction, throttle, etc. It's all down to driver skill and making the correct calls on the pit-wall for tyres and fuel. In that way, it makes it a pure form of racing that Formula One was, but never will be again.
It's not all about turning left. An oval track has many characteristics. The camber of the track, the consistency of the tarmac and the entry into the pitlane all present different challenges to NASCAR drivers. It's not all ovals either. The annual road course Infineon Speedway and Watkins Glen means the teams have to have a set-up for a circuit race. Plus it gives fans the oppurtunity to visit a great former F1 track like the Glen. Incidentely, the last winner of the race held there? That would be one Juan Pablo Montoya. Remember him?
Races can finish like this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKuePDHXqes
Formula One has only one 7-time champion. NASCAR has two. And while Michael Schumacher has 91 race wins to his name - with the chance to add to that total - "The King" Richard Petty amassed an astounding 200 hundred career wins. I'll repeat that. Two hundred race victories. Unlike Schumacher though, The King knew when to pack it all in, retiring in 1992 after 34 seasons.
It too has lost it's legend. The other 7-time champ, "The Intimidator" Dale Earnhardt, lost his life in an accident at the 2001 Daytona event. After his accident, the sport reviewed it's safety measures and revamped driver protection making sure that Earnhardt's crash wasn't to be repeated. It was an almost eerie mirror to the loss of Ayrton Senna. Like in Formula One, these changes have led to no more fatalities in the sport.
Every major talking point in it's history has a label. Just like a chapter in a book, when something significant happens in Stock Cars it's given a title for people to remember. If you have time, simply search for a few things in YouTube. Personal favourites of mine are "The Pass in The Grass" and "One Hot Night" (yep, that one's legit).
For some, NASCAR may just be four left turns in a big-engined touring car, but if you dig a little deeper under the surface you have the history and fanaticism that not only matches Grand Prix, but in some quarters, drafts right past it.
FURTHER READING
Here's another article you may enjoy, if you enjoyed this one...





















Comments and Discussion
Reasons to like NASCAR, it's streamed free on several sites for those that don't have Sky TV. Plus it's always on on Sunday evenings when there's nothing else on
Indycar is on, and it's better than NASCAR. Not to tread on what Craig's said here, but I suspect he may agree.
Nope, still not convinced
It might help if you watched a race, Dave.
I'm with you there Jimmy, I prefer Indaycar (you get great coverage on their official site) but I wanted to keep o'on topic' but since you brought it up......
Unfortunately live video coverage has now gone from the Indycar site.
But anyway, NASCAR...
Probably, but i'd be complaining about it constantly!
I'd watch indycar with no complaints though.
Don't forget the 2007 Daytona 500, another fantastic finish - the pace car came in with just two laps to go...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ZOltYjYk4E
"The National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing has been active since 1948"
And, for the most part, still uses the same technology as back then.
The sight of Takuma Sato muscling a Lotus-liveried beast around an airport runway is a joy to behold.
You're not wrong. Here's Juan Pablo Montoya at Martinsville last weekend: http://bit.ly/dJQoYE
Really? I missed St. Pete, I'm sure I'll find a good stream on Justin.tv
Thank you Ben, at last someone who can ignore IndyCar and see some joy in NASCAR!
Shall I write an IndyCar article too? There's far to much talk of it on this article about Kimi and NASCAR...
I just wished there was an (un)official iDevice app for watching NASCAR live.
Fanboy alert!
Rather by accident, I today discovered that there is a band named Dale Earnhardt Jr. Jr. They seem totally un-influenced by NASCAR (the name aside) but hey, it's worth a mention. And where are the F1-inspired band names, huh?
Bill Elliott is "Awesome Bill from Dawsonville" The rainbow warriors were Jeff Gordon's pit crew. NASCAR isn't so bad. It's not f1 and it's certainly a different culture there but it's entertaining. It's completely different from f1. If you haven't watched a race, I would encourage you to do so. If you can enjoy the strategy in an f1 race, it's simple elitism that doesn't allow you to enjoy any other brand of racing.
Agree on the nicknames, Bill Elliot was the first to win the Winston Million and gained the "Million Dollar" name from that. Jeff Gordan ran DuPont paint colours to get his name, but the pit crew had it too. Good knowledge!
I agree in the fact that every fan should try NASCAR once. It is an aquired taste but the best way of describing it is Touring Cars at F1 speeds!
NASCAR is a top racing series which isn't overblown like F1. They don't mess about with it and the result is great racing
What about Lucky Dog?
Lucky dog is a gimmick that allows the first car a lap down to have their lap back during a caution as long as that car didn't cause the caution. It's something to draw the casual fan or keep fans from turning off the television when their driver gets a lap down. It's an insult to real racing. To put it another way, think DRS or KERS.
Just thought of two more reasons to like NASCAR:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W__z4hJA4XU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AngziZnlE0c